Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Unions
Sgt

Another article is provided below titled:

Windsor Locks Fires Police Sgt. Robert Koistinen

 

State's bad heart-and-hypertension law. - Hartford Courant

Windsor Locks case reminds us to base laws on good science

December 16, 2011

With Sgt. Robert Koistinen on paid leave and facing criminal charges, it doubtless irks many Windsor Locks residents that they have to come up with almost $50,000 in disability payments for him.

Sgt. Koistinen, who is awaiting trial on charges that he interfered with the investigation of a fatal crash involving his son, also a police officer, will receive $48,815 in disability payments for heart and hypertension ailments. He is a beneficiary of one of the most misguided and expensive laws passed by the General Assembly in living memory.

The heart and hypertension law, which dates from the 1970s, created an irrebuttable presumption that heart disease or hypertension contracted by a police officer or firefighter was job-related, automatically entitling the cop or firefighter to benefits.  Read the entire article at http://articles.courant.com/2011-12-16/news/hc-ed-heart-and-hypertension-20111216_1_heart-and-hypertension-public-safety-officers-police-officer

*************************

 

Sgt. Robert Koistinen Fired: windsor locks police commission fires ...

Windsor Locks Fires Police Sgt. Robert Koistinen

January 11, 2012|By KIM VELSEY, kvelsey@courant.com, The Hartford Courant

WINDSOR LOCKS — —

Sgt. Robert Koistinen, who is charged with interfering with the investigation of a fatal car crash involving his son, was fired by the police commission Wednesday night — a decision that was met with applause from the room of residents in attendance.

The police commission voted to terminate Koistinen after several hours of testimony and discussion spanning two nights, during which commissioners considered acting Chief Chester DeGray's recommendation that Koistinen receive a 90-day suspension and be demoted to a patrolman.

Koistinen has been on paid administrative leave, receiving his $73,000 salary, since the October 2010 crash when a car driven by his son, former Officer Michael Koistinen, hit and killed 15-year-old bicyclist Henry Dang.

Robert Koistinen has been charged with third-degree hindering prosecution and interfering with police at the scene of the crash. He was the first police supervisor on the scene and, according to police, removed Michael Koistinen from the scene and prevented authorities from administering a blood alcohol test. An independent report released in August also faulted Robert Koistinen's behavior at the crash.

All but one member of the police commission voted to terminate Koistinen. Before casting the only dissenting vote, commission member James Gaylord moved that the commission follow DeGray's recommendation. Gaylord said that he believed the public's demand for termination was based on the perception that there was a cover-up, which the independent report did not find evidence of.

DeGray said that he based his recommendation on the independent report and his findings that Koistinen deviated from the policies and procedures of the department the night of the crash. He said that he believed his recommendation, especially considering the substantial financial burden of 90 days without pay, had been a severe one.

Police commission Chairman Neal Cunningham said that the decision to fire Koistinen had been difficult.

"We terminated an officer that has been a fine officer for over 30 years," Cunningham said. "But given the fact that there were charges of neglect of duty and conduct unbecoming an officer, we thought termination was appropriate."

Koistinen may appeal the decision to the State Board of Labor Relations. His pension, according to Cunningham, is not likely to be affected by his dismissal.

Cunningham said that the commission did consider the public's comments and how the town would receive Koistinen as an officer if he were to return to the department.

At public hearings the last two nights, residents called for Koistinen to be fired, telling the commission that Koistinen had acted to protect his son, not the public, on the night of the crash, and should not be allowed to remain an officer.

On Tuesday, resident Antoinette Brussiere said that keeping Koistinen in the department was unacceptable.

"I raised my son to respect the police department, but to cover up a story like this with another child was just wrong," she said. "If he's not fired, it just shows that we're no good to no one and that you don't protect us."  Read the entire article at http://articles.courant.com/2012-01-11/community/hc-koistinen-disciplinary-hearing-0112-20120111_1_robert-koistinen-chairman-neal-cunningham-police-commission